Biomarker: Indicator for
Disease
Rupali Kirtawade*, Pallavi Salve, Chhotaram Seervi, Anita
Kulkarni and Pandurang Dhabale
Govt.
ABSTRACT:
Biomarkers
are referred to every means of tools for quantifiable measurements of
biological homeostasis, which distinguish what is abnormal from normal. In
other words any accessible, quantifiable signal that informs about the state of
health for biological system. This is a broad definition that encompasses a range
of measurements - physical, biochemical and even questionnaires. Also it gives
measure changes occur in blood, serum, plasma, enzyme, body fluid and any
normal constituent in body, which indicates the disease condition.
Biomarkers
also play a very important role in identification of cerebrovascular diseases
like Alzheimer’s, frontotemporal dementia (FTD), Pulmonary Hypertension, lung cancer, Thyroid cancer etc. Whatever the measurement, a good
biomarker should possess specific characteristics and be subject to robust
statistical analysis.The focus of this review will inform us the potential value of Biomarker in all above
said. A biochemical test that indicates the presence of subclinical disease
would allow early intervention and possibly a better chance of altering the
course of the disease. Although there have been considerable advances, many
areas of drug development still require kinetic biomarkers. In principle,
biomarker can be developed for any system in
which the rate of synthesis or degradation of a protein, lipid, carbohydrate,
ribonucleotide or cell is desired. We emphasized on many target pathways of
interest to pharmaceutical research and noted the potential for applying stable
biomarkers.
INTRODUCTION:
A biomarker, or biological marker, is in general a substance used as an indicator of a biologic
state. It is a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator
of normal biological processes, pathogenic
processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention. It is used in
many scientific fields. Biomarker discovery is the
process by which biomarkers are discovered. It is a medical
term.
Many commonly used blood tests in medicine are biomarkers. The way
that these tests have been found can be seen as biomarker discovery. However,
their identification has mostly been a one-at-a time approach. Many of these
well-known tests have been identified based on clear biological insight, from physiology
or biochemistry.
This means that only a few markers at a time have been considered. One example
of this way of biomarker discovery is the use of injections of insulin for
measuring kidney function. From this, one discovered a naturally occurring
molecule, creatinine,
that enabled the same measurements to be made easily without injections. This
can be seen as a serial process.
The recent interest in biomarker discovery is because new molecular
biologic techniques promise to find relevant markers rapidly, without
detailed insight into mechanisms of disease. By screening many possible biomolecules
at a time, a parallel approach can be tried. Genomics
and proteomics
are some technologies that are used in this process. Significant technical
difficulties remain.There is considerable interest in biomarker discovery from
the pharmaceutical industry. Blood test or
other biomarkers could serve as intermediate markers of disease in clinical
trials, and also be possible drug targets.
Biomarkers
disambiguation; classified by scientific field:
Geology,
astrobiology,
and biochemistry-
A biomarker can be any kind of molecule
indicating the existence, past or present, of living organisms. In the fields
of geology
and astrobiology,
biomarkers are also known as biosignatures. The term biomarker is also used
to describe biological involvement in the generation of petroleum. A biosignature,
or biomarker, is any phenomenon produced by life, either modern or
ancient. In astrobiology, a biosignature is a sign of the
presence of extraterrestrial life. Observation of
possible biosignatures are normally made by relatively simple observations
(e.g. geological, textural, geochemical).
Biosignatures need not be chemical, however. The shape and size of
certain objects may potentially indicate the presence of life. For example,
tiny magnetite
crystals in the Martian meteorite ALH84001 were the longest-debated of several potential
biosignatures in that specimen because it was believed until recently that only
bacteria could create crystals of their specific shape. However, anomalous
features discovered that are "possible biosignatures" for life forms
would be investigated as well. Such features constitute a working hypothesis,
not confirmation that life exists and has been detected. Concluding that
evidence of an extraterrestrial life form (past or present) has been discovered
requires proving that a possible biosignature was produced by the activities or
remains of life.1 For example, the possible biomineral
studied in the Martiam ALH84001 meteorite includes putative microbial fossils,
tiny rock-like structures whose shape was a potential biosignature because it
resembled known bacteria. Most scientists ultimately concluded that these were
far too small to be fossilized cells.
A consensus that has emerged from these discussions, and is now seen as a
critical requirement, is the demand for further lines of evidence in addition
to any morphological data that supports such extraordinary claims.
From this point of view, even the hypothetical radio signatures that SETI scans for would be an
electromagnetic biosignature, since a
message from intelligent aliens would certainly demonstrate the existence of
extraterrestrial life.
Biomarker (medicine):
In medicine, a biomarker is a term often used to refer to a protein
measured in blood whose concentration reflects the severity or prescence of
some disease state. More generally a biomarker is an indicator of a particular
disease state or some other state of an organism.
An NIH study group committed to the following definition in 1998:
"a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an
indicator of normal biologic processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic
responses to a therapeutic intervention." In the past, biomarkers were
primarily physiological indicators such as blood pressure or heart rate. More
recently, biomarker is becoming a synonym for molecular biomarker, such as
elevated prostate specific antigen as a molecular biomarker for prostate
cancer, or using enzyme assays as liver function tests. There has recently been
heightened interest in the relevance of biomarkers in oncology, including the
role of KRAS in CRC and other EGFR-associated cancers. In patients whose tumors
express the mutated KRAS gene, the KRAS protein, which forms part of the EGFR
signaling pathway, is always ‘turned on’. This overactive EGFR signaling means
that signaling continues downstream – even when the upstream signaling is
blocked by an EGFR inhibitor, such as cetuximab (Erbitux) – and results in
continued cancer cell growth and proliferation. Testing a tumor for its KRAS
status (wild-type vs. mutant) helps to identify those patients who will benefit
most from treatment with cetuximab.
Biomarkers also cover the use of molecular indicators of environmental
exposure in epidemiologic studies such as human papilloma virus or certain
markers of tobacco exposure such as 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone
(NNK). To date no biomarkers have been established for SCCHN.
Many fundamental risk in general medical practices are made by
assessment of biomarkers. A Biomarker is a parameter that can be used to
measure the progress of disease or the effects of treatment. The parameter can
be chemical, physical or biological. In molecular terms biomarker is "the
subset of markers that might be discovered using genomics, proteomics
technologies or imaging technologies. Biomarkers plays major role in medicinal
biology. Biomarker brings the future things in our hand by helping in early
diagnosis, disease prevention, drug target identification, drug response etc.
Several diseased based biomarker had been identified for many diseases such as
serum LDL for cholesterol, blood pressure, P53 gene2 and
MMPs3 for cancer etc. Gene
based biomarker is found to be an effective and acceptable marker in the
present scientific world.
In psychiatric research, a fruitful way of finding genetic causes for
diseases such as schizophrenia has been the use of a special
kind of biomarker called an endophenotype.
Biomarker (cell):
A biomarker can be understood as a molecule
that is present (or absent) from a particular cellular type. This facilitates
the characterization of a cell type, their identification, and eventually their
isolation. Cell sorting techniques are based on cellular biomarkers (for
example, Fluorescent-activated cell sorting).
A biomarker can be used to measure the progress of disease or the effects of
treatment.4 One example of cellular biomarker is the protein Oct-4 that is found in embryonic stem cells.
Biomarkers
of exposure assessment:
Biomarkers are very useful in the world of exposure assessment when dealing with direct measurement
methods. The use of biomarkers in exposure studies is also referred to as biomonitoring. They are chemicals,
metabolites, susceptibility characteristics, or changes in the body that relate
to the exposure of an organism to a chemical. Biomarkers have the ability to
identify if an exposure has occurred, the route of exposure, the pathway of
exposure, or the resulting effects of the exposure. When dealing with exposure
assessment, there are three types of biomarkers that can be useful, biomarkers
of susceptibility, biomarkers of exposure, and biomarkers of effect.
Biomarkers of susceptibility are indicators of the natural
characteristics of an organism that make it more susceptible to the effects of
an exposure to a chemical. They can help define what sensitivities are more
susceptible as well as critical times when exposures can be most detrimental.
For example, the exhalation strength of an asthmatic will indicate how
susceptible that person would be to the respiratory effects of exposure to
brevetoxin, the toxic compound produced during a red tide.
Biomarkers of exposure are the actual chemicals, or chemical
metabolites, that can be measured in the body or after excretion from the body
to determine different characteristics of a person’s exposure. For example a
person’s blood can be tested to see the levels of lead and therefore determine
the exposure.
Biomarkers of effect are the quantifiable changes that an individual
endures, which indicates an exposure to a compound and may indicate a resulting
health effect. For example, after exposure to DDT, an organophosphate pesticide
known to cause problems in the reproductive system and woman may experience
miscarriages, which can be linked to her previous exposure.
Biomarkers of exposure are the most widely used because they can provide
information on the route, pathway, and sometime, even the source of exposure.
These indicators also allow researchers to work forward in time to determine an
exposure, and prevent it from causing further damage. This is unlike biomarkers
of effect, in which a scientist may work backwards to determine if and what
kind of exposure took place, but may be too late to change anything. However,
biomarkers of effect are useful for future studies on the chemical(s) of
interest and the results may aid in stricter laws or guidelines regarding the
chemical(s).
Biomarkers must be evaluated in terms of their ability to predict and
quantify exposure and dose. There are certain properties that are desirable
when linking a biomarker with an exposure. These include high specificity (one
exposure to one biomarker), linear relationship across time, strong correlation
with a health effect, inexpensive study, and consistency (the same exposure
will produce the same concentration of the biomarker every time). Without these
ideal characteristics, the use of biomarkers as a strong predictor of exposure
has limitations.
Many different classes of compounds can be measured in different tissues
and parts of the body. From breath to hair to saliva, almost every tissue in
the body has been tested as a biomarker of exposure and almost every major
environmental pollutant can be identified by biomarkers, including volatile
organic chemicals (VOCs) and metals like arsenic or lead. It all depends on the
chemical structures and reactivity of the compound with the makeup of its
storage space. The following table identifies major environmental pollutants
and their biomarker tissue or organ.5
Genetic marker:
A genetic marker is a gene or DNA sequence
with a known location on a chromosome and associated with a particular gene or trait. It can be
described as a variation, which may arise due to mutation or alteration in the
genomic loci, that can be observed. A genetic marker may be a short DNA
sequence, such as a sequence surrounding a single base-pair change (single nucleotide polymorphism,
SNP), or a long one, like minisatellites.6
Applications of
Biomarkers:-
1. Biomarkers of cerebrovascular
disease in dementia:
It is increasingly clear that, although dementing illnesses can arise as
a result of a single pathogenetic process, they more commonly occur in the
presence of multiple aetiological insults. Neurodegenerative processes
including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and dementia
with Lewy bodies can each cause severe dementing syndromes. It is common for
these disorders to coexist with significant cerebral vascular pathology.
However, in patients with a combination of neurodegenerative and vascular
abnormalities, the relative significance of the separate pathological processes
to the clinical features of the disease remains unclear. It has long been known
that AD is more severe in the presence of established cerebral infarction7,8,
and autopsy studies show 70% of patients with definite AD to have evidence of
coexistent cerebrovascular disease and 35% to have had a cerebral infarction.9-12
Imaging biomarkers of cerebrovascular disease biomarkers:
have been identified as potentially useful in other diseases of the
ageing brain that are associated with vascular pathology, such as late-onset
depression, but they are described here because they have potential direct
relevance to dementing disease.
1a.White matter lesions
(leukoaraiosis):
The presence of white matter abnormalities in the brains of elderly
subjects has been recognized for many years. The ability of CT and MRI to identify
and localize these lesions has caused these techniques to be widely used as
potential biomarkers of ischaemic cerebral injury. These lesions are best seen
on heavily T2 weighted MRI sequences, consist of areas of high signal and most
frequently occur in the deep parts of the corona radiata and centrum semiovale,
giving rise to the commonly used term ‘‘deep white matter hyperintensities’’
(DWMH). Periventricular hyperintensity (PVH) around the margins of the lateral
ventricles also occurs with ageing, and in most forms of cerebral disease is
usually seen in association with DWMH.
PVH may simply be due to increased interstitial fluid secondary to an
increased passage of CSF from the lateral ventricle into the interstitial space13,
which can be associated with a wide range of pathologies that alter the
hydrodynamics of CSF absorption and transfer.
Pathological studies have shown that DWMH are seen in approximately 60% of patients with AD, and their presence
is strongly correlated with the presence of arteriosclerotic changes in small
cerebral arterial vessels.14
In the early 1990s, Fazekas et al15and other groups
demonstrated that the severity of DWMH was related to other evidence of
ischaemic cerebrovascular disease. This led to the development of a number of
semiquantitative classification systems based on the anatomical location,
number and size of DWMH.16,17 More recently automated image analysis
techniques have been widely used for quantitative assessment, and DWMH are
commonly used as surrogate imaging markers of vascular damage.18,19
1b. Biomarkers of
microvascular angiopathy:
Ageing is associated with evidence of cerebral arteriosclerotic
microvascular disease, often referred to as MVA.20,21,22 MVA forms a
spectrum of severity, with lowgrade changes characterized by increased
tortuosity and irregularity in small arteries and arterioles (Grade 1)23
,As these changes progress to Grade 2, there is sclerosis of vessel walls, in
which hyalinosis and lipid deposits are seen, along with regional loss of smooth
muscle.
These features are commonly associated with lacunes thathistologically
consist of three distinct types: Type 1 are small old cystic infarcts, Type 2
are scars of small haematomas and Type 3 are dilated Virchow–Robin spaces
(VRS).24 Grade 3 microangiopathy is especially related to severe
chronic hypertension and demonstrates fibrotic wall thickening.
In
depressive disorder, there is a higher rate of T2 weighted hyperintensities
within the deep white matter and basal ganglia among older depressed patients
compared to control subjects,25,26 especially when the initial onset
of depression occurs later in life (typically after 55 years).27
1b (i). Lacunar infarction:
Pathological
studies suggest that there are actually two types of lacunar infarction with
different clinical manifestations.28 Lacunar infarcts that result in
clinical stroke syndromes (Type 1a lacunae) seem to be due mainly to
obstruction of the trunk of a perforating artery by atherosclerosis. Silent
lacunar infarcts (Type 1b lacunae) result from obstruction of small
ramifications of the perforating arteries by microvascular angio( MVA).
These
lacunes are typically distributed along the path of the strio-thalamic
arteries, which penetrate the perforator substance passing upwards through the
globus pallidus, putamen and caudate nucleus and into the adjacent white matter
pathways.
1b (ii). Virchow–Robin spaces:
Virchow–Robin
spaces are virtual perivascular spaces that surround the perforating arteries
entering the brain. Dilated VRS appear as small linear structures perpendicular
to the brain surface and with signal intensity equal to that of CSF on all
pulse sequences.29-31
Several
mechanisms for the formation of dilated VRS have been proposed.32,33
These include mechanical trauma due to CSF pulsation or vascular ectasia ,29,34
fluid exudation due to abnormalities of the vessel wall permeability,35,36
and ischaemic injury to perivascular tissue causing a secondary ex-vacuo
effect.37
2.Biomarkers in Pulmonary Hypertension:
Pulmonary hypertension
can develop suddenly but usually develops over months and years, depending on
the underlying etiology. It follows that as pulmonary artery pressure rises
gradually, the right ventricle has more time to adapt and compensate and
symptoms may be slow to emerge. The identification of mutations in bone
morphogenetic protein receptor type 2
(BMPR2)38-43 and the ALK1 receptor44-46 opened up
new avenues for understanding the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial
hypertension (PAH).
One biomarker
that has attracted interest in this regard is B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP).47-57
BNP is synthesized and released by the myocardium and its levels are
affected by the degree of myocardial stretch, damage, and ischemia in the
ventricle.58-60 It is cleaved at the time of release into NT-proBNP
and a C-terminal fragment, BNP32. The latter possesses vasorelaxant and
natriuretic properties, is cleared by neutral endopeptidase and the clearance
natriuretic peptide receptor (NPR-C), and has a relatively short plasma half-life
(20 minutes).61 The N-terminal fragment is biologically inactive, is
cleared by the kidney, has a longer plasma half-life, and is more stable in
plasma samples ex vivo.62 NT-proBNP levels may be more useful than
measurements of BNP32.47-49,51,53
A number of
biochemical measurements have been reported to correlate with prognosis.
NT-proBNP,57 BNP32,57 ANP,57 troponin,63
uric acid,64 and growth differentiation factor- 15 (GDF15)65
and serum creatinine66, recognized recently are examples. The first
three reflect cardiac work and, in the case of troponin, myocardial damage.
Raised serum creatinine reflects renal dysfunction.
A recent study
has suggested the combination of NT-proBNP and GDF15 measurements offer a
better prognostic score65 but this has not been demonstrated
prospectively.
3.Biomarkers in Thyroid Cancer Gene Expression
Profiling Studies:-
Thyroid nodules
are extremely common, being palpable in 4% to 7% of the North
American adult population, with new nodules detected at a yearly
rate of 0.1%.67,68 Currently, fine-needle aspiration
biopsy (FNAB) represents the most important initial test for
diagnosing malignancy. The result of the FNAB cytology can be
classified as benign (70% of cases), malignant 72(5% to 10%),
indeterminate or suspicious (10% to 20%), or nondiagnostic (10% to
15%).69-71Although nondiagnostic FNABs can be repeated, the
indeterminate or suspicious group presents a dilemma for the
clinician. In a recent report from our center on 80 patients who
underwent thyroid resection for an indeterminate FNAB diagnosis of
follicular neoplasm (FN), only 20% were confirmed as malignant. Thus,
many patients undergo thyroid surgery for nodular disease that is
eventually diagnosed as benign disease.
A vote-counting
strategy based on the number of studies reporting a gene as
differentially expressed and further ranking based on total sample
size and average fold-change. Similar strategies have been used to
show that gene pairs consistently coexpressed in multiple platforms73
are more likely to share a common biologic process.
4. Future Biomarkers for Detection of Ischemia and Risk
Stratification in Acute Coronary Syndrome:-
Millions of
patients with chest pain present annually to hospitals, and many
more present with other symptoms potentially indicative of ischemia.74-77
A considerable proportion have suspected acute coronary syndromes
(ACS).74
Recent investigations have indicated that increases in
biomarkers upstream from markers of necrosis, such as inflammatory
cytokines, cellular adhesion molecules, acute-phase reactants,
plaque destabilization and rupture biomarkers, biomarkers of
ischemia, and biomarkers of myocardial stretch may provide an
earlier assessment of overall patient risk and aid in identifying
patients with higher risk of having an adverse event.
|
Pollutant Group |
Parent Compound |
Metabolite |
|
VOCs |
Breath, blood |
Blood, urine |
|
Tetrachoroethylene |
Breath, blood, mothers' milk |
None |
|
SVOCs (pesticides, PCBs, PAHs, dioxins/furans |
Blood, fat, mothers' milk |
Blood, urine |
|
Metals |
Blood, bone, hair, cord blood, placenta, feces |
|
|
Carbon monoxide |
Breath, blood |
Blood (carboxyhemoglobin) |
|
Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) |
Breath, blood (2,5-dimethylfuran) |
Saliva, blood (cotinine) |
4a. Myeloperoxidase- It is released into the
extracellular fluid and general circulation during inflammatory
conditions. This enzyme has been implicated in the oxidation of
lipids contained within LDL.78
There have been a few clinical studies examining the
role of myeloperoxidase as a marker of risk for ACS. Using an enzyme
assay, Zhang et al.79 showed that blood and leukocyte
myeloperoxidase activities were higher in patients with coronary
artery disease (CAD) than angiographically verified
normal controls, and that these increased activities were
significantly associated with presence of CAD [odds ratio, 11.9; 95%
confidence interval (CI), 5.5–2 Zhang R, Brennan ML, Fu X, Aviles RJ, Pearse
GL, Penn MS, et al.
4b. Choline- It and phosphatidic acid are major products
generated by phosphodiesteric cleavage of membrane phospholipids
(phosphatidylcholine for example) catalyzed by phospholipase D
enzymes. Whole-blood choline (WBCHO) and plasma choline (PLCHO)
concentrations increase rapidly after stimulation of phospholipase D
(PLD) and the activation of cell surface receptors in coronary
plaque destabilization and tissue ischemia.80
Increased WBCHO concentrations were first identified as
a promising marker for ACS by use of high-resolution proton magnetic
resonance spectroscopy. WBCHO was a significant predictor of cardiac
death or cardiac arrest, life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias, heart
failure, and coronary angioplasty when measured in the first blood
sample on admission. cTnI or cTnT and WBCHO were the most powerful
independent predictors in multivariate analysis, and the combination
of WBCHO and cardiac troponins allowed a superior risk assessment
compared with each test alone. WBCHO was not a marker for myocardial
necrosis but indicated high-risk UA in patients without acute
Myocardial infraction (sensitivity, 86.4%;
specificity, 86.2%).
4c. Free
fatty acids (FFAs)-These are bound with albumin, with only a
small amount of the total, the unbound FFAs (FFAu), present as
the soluble form. The mechanisms that initiate and maintain increased FFAu
concentrations after ischemia are not clear. Increased blood
catecholamines in association with ischemia suggest that increased
FFAu concentrations result from increased FFA release through
adipose lipolysis. Although ischemia activates lipid hydrolysis
within the heart, the large increases in serum FFAu are
likely attributable to FFAs originating from other tissues, such as
adipose, along with a reduction of FFA use after ischemia.
4d. MMPs
are a class of 24 endopeptidases that are physiologic regulators of
the extracellular matrix.81
4e. Pregnancy-associated
plasma protein A (PAPP-A)-It is a
high–molecular-mass (
200
kDa) glycoprotein synthesized by the syncytiotrophoblast and is
typically measured during pregnancy for screening of Down syndrome82.
It was reported to be an insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-dependent
IGF-binding protein-4-specific metalloproteinase, thus potentially a
proatherosclerotic molecule through its role in disrupting the
integrity of the atheroma’s protective cap.83
PAPP-A has also been evaluated as a marker of
cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic hyperlipidemic individuals, showing a
correlation with the degree of echogenicity of carotid atherosclerotic
plaques84. However, PAPP-A concentrations were not influenced by statin
treatment.85 These preliminary findings suggest that increases in PAPP-A
concentrations may not be limited to ACS patients but could also reflect the
earlier stages of atherosclerotic lesions, even in the absence of clinical
signs of atherosclerosis.86
5. Biomarkers
for lung cancer:
There are several
distinct types of cancer biomarkers based on different areas: genetics,
epigenetics, proteomics, metabolomics, imaging technology, and general physical
techniques. Genetics- based cancer biomarkers utilize DNA arrays, polymerase
chain reaction (PCR), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR),
DNA sequencing, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) etc. to detect the
genetic alterations occurring in the cancerous state. On the other hand, recent
development of epigenetic modification analysis also provides tools as cancer
biomarkers. Epigenetic modification usually occurs in CpG island of the gene
regulatory regions, which results in the down-regulation of the gene
expression. These alterations can evade the cells from their normal cell cycle
control, and thus result in cancer cells formation.87,88
5a. DNA-based
lung cancer biomarkers-
Cancers are
thought to arise by genetic alteration, environmental factors and combined
both. Although fewer than 10% of cancers are considered to be linked to
Mendelian inheritance of genetic traits89, genetics are closely
related to the nature of the cancer. Following the development in genomics,
fundamental advances in DNA- or RNA-based cancer biomarkers have been brought
into clinical uses.89
5a(i). Chromosomal
changes:
Inactivation of
tumor suppressor genes during the cell division is one of the key factors that
drive clonal cells of cancer into uncontrolled growth, migration and
metastasis.90 In many cases the inactivation is induced by loss of
DNA or chromosomal rearrangement accidentally happening during cellular
division. Most well-known frequently occurring abnormality is deletion of the
short arm of chromosome 3 (3p) where several TSG are present.91-94
Loss of chromosomal material has also been reported to be detected in
metaplastic epithelium tissues of smoker or exsmokers. The loss of one allele
or loss of herterozygosity (LOH) indicates predisposing potentials to lung
cancers, too.95,96
5a(ii). Gene
hypermethylation:
Altered
hypermethylation, methylation of the cytosine phosphate guanosine rich regions
(CpG islands) of various promoter regions, is a representative epigenetic
change in the cell and may cause gene silencing. As an alternative mechanism
for inactivating TSGs, hypermethylation is generally discovered in most tumors,
including lung cancer.97,98-104 Thus, certain methylation status in
the genes can be biomakers in lung cancers especially in TSGs.
CONCLUSION:
Biomarkers can be
used to follow the course of a patient's disease and monitor his/her response
to therapy. At present this is done on the basis of patients' symptoms,
measures of functional capacity such as 6-minute walk test, and
echocardiography findings. Chromosomal changes, Gene hypermethylation are
useful for lung cancer. Myeloperoxidase, Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A
(PAPP-A), Choline are biomarkers for Detection of Ischemia and Risk
Stratification in Acute Coronary Syndrome.
B-type
natriuretic peptide are helpful in Pulmonary Hypertension. The availability of
new high-throughput technologies in genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, and
metabolomics has opened up approaches for novel biomarker discovery. Screening
blood samples, circulating cells and tissue from well-phenotyped patient groups
is an active area of research in a number of centers.
REFERENCES:
1.
Steele,
A., Beaty; et al. (September 26, 2006), "Final report
of the MEPAG Astrobiology Field Laboratory Science Steering Group (AFL-SSG)",
in Steele, Andrew (.doc), The Astrobiology Field Laboratory, U.S.A.: the Mars
Exploration Program Analysis Group (MEPAG) - NASA, pp. 72
2.
Loukopoulos
P,et al . Clinical and pathologic relevance of p53 index in canine osseous
tumors. Veterinary Pathology 2003; 40:237-248
3.
Loukopoulos
P,et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 involvement in canine tumors.
Veterinary Pathology 2003; 40:382-394
4.
Medterms
definition Ott, W. R., Steinemann, (2007).
5.
Biomarkers
of exposure. In W. R. Ott, A. C. Steinemann & L. A. Wallace (Eds.),
Exposure analysis (pp. 395-404).
6.
De
Vicente, C., T. Fulton (2003). Molecular
Marker Learning Modules – Vol. 1.. IPGRI,
7.
Heyman
A, et al. Cerebral infarcts in patients with autopsy-proven Alzheimer’s
disease: CERAD, part XVIII . Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s
Disease. Neurology 1998;51:159–62.
8.
Snowdon
DA, et al. Brain infarction and the clinical expression of Alzheimer disease.
The Nun Study. JAMA 1997;277:813–7.
9.
Kalaria
R. Similarities between Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. J Neurol Sci
2002;203–204:29–34.
10. Kalaria RN. The blood–brain barrier and
cerebrovascular pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann NY Acad Sci
1999;893:113–25.
11. Kalaria RN. Small vessel disease and
Alzheimer’s dementia: pathological considerations. Cerebrovasc Dis 2002;13
(Suppl 2):48–52.
12. Kalaria RN. Vascular factors in Alzheimer’s
disease. Int Psychogeriatr 2003;15 (Suppl 1):47–52.
13.
14. Tian J,et al . Relationships between
arteriosclerosis, cerebral amyloid angiopathy and myelin loss from cerebral
cortical white matter in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol
2004;30:46–56.
15. Fazekas F, et al. Pathologic correlates of
incidental MRI white matter signal hyperintensities. Neurology1993;43:1683–9.
16. Fazekas F,et al. MR signal abnormalities at
1.5 T in Alzheimer’s dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:
351–6.
17. Scheltens P, et al. A semiquantative rating
scale for the assessment of signal hyperintensities on magnetic resonance
imaging. J Neurol Sci 1993;114:7–12.
18. Fazekas F, et al. CT and MRI rating of white
matter lesions. Cerebrovasc Dis 2002;13 Suppl 2:31–6.
19. Scheltens P, et al. White matter changes on
CT and MRI: an overview of visual rating scales. European Task Force on
Age-Related White Matter Changes. Eur Neurol 1998;39:80–9.
20.
21. Jellinger KA. The pathology of
ischemic-vascular dementia: an update. J Neurol Sci 2002;203–204:153–7.
22. Esiri MM, et al Neuropathological assessment
of the lesions of significance in vascular dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry 1997;63:749–53.
23. Hommel M, Gray F. Microvascular pathology.
24. Poirier J, et al . Cerebral lacunae. A
proposed new classification. Clin Neuropathol 1984;3:266.
25. Baldwin RC, O’Brien J. Vascular basis of
late-onset depressive disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:157–60.
26. O’Brien JT, Ames D. White matter lesions in
depression and Alzheimer’s disease. Br J Psychiatry 1996;169:671.
27. Alexopoulos GS, et al ‘‘Vascular
depression’’ hypothesis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997;54:915–22.
28. Derouesne C, Poirier J. Cerebral lacunae: still
under debate. Rev Neurol (
29. Heier LA, et al. Large Virchow-Robin spaces:
MRclinical correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989;10:929–36.
30. Braffman BH, et al pathologic correlation
with gross and histopathology. 1. Lacunar infarction and Virchow-Robin spaces.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:551–8.
31. Machado MA, et al Dilatation of Virchow-Robzin spaces in
patients with migraine. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2001;59:206–9.
32. Fazekas F,
et al. The morphologic correlate of incidental punctate white matter
hyperintensities on MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:915–21.
33. Ogawa T, et al. Unusual widening of
Virchow-Robin spaces: MR appearance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1238 -42.
34. Hughes W. Origin of lacunes. Lancet. 1965;
35. Benhaiem-Sigaux N, et al Expanding
cerebellar lacunes due to dilatation of the perivascular space associated with
Binswanger’s subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy. Stroke
1987;18:1087–92.
36. Derouesne C, ‘‘Expanding cerebral lacunae’’
in a hypertensive patient with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neuropathol Appl
Neurobiol 1987;13:309–20.
37. Pullicino PM, Miller LL, Alexandrov AV,
Ostrow PT. Infraputaminal ‘‘lacunes’’. Clinical and pathological correlations.
Stroke 1995;26:1598–602.
38. Aldred MA, et al. BMPR2 gene rearrangements
account for a signiÞ cant proportion of
mutations in familial and idiopathic
bpulmonary arterial hypertension. Hum Mutat 2006;27:212-3.
39. Cogan JD, et
al. High frequency
of BMPR2 exonic
deletions/ duplications in familial pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am
J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;174:590-8.
40. Lane KB, et al. Heterozygous germline
mutations in BMPR2, encoding a
TGF-â receptor, cause
familial primary pulmonary
hypertension: The International
PPH Consortium. Nat
Genet 2000;26:81-4.
41.
42. Morisaki H, et al BMPR2 mutations found in
Japanese patients with familial and
sporadic primary pulmonary
hypertension. Hum Mutat 2004;23:632.
43. Roberts KE, et al.
BMPR2 mutations in
pulmonary arterial hypertension
with congenital heart disease.
Eur Respir J 2004;24:371-4.
44. Harrison
RE, et al. Molecular and
functional analysis identiÞ es
ALK-1 as the predominant cause
of pulmonary hypertension
related to hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. J Med Genet 2003;40:865-71.
45. Trembath
RC. Mutations in
the TGF-â type
1 receptor, ALK1, in
combined primary pulmonary
hypertension and hereditary
haemorrhagic telangiectasia, implies pathway speciÞ city. J Heart Lung Transplant 2001;20:175.
46. Trembath RC, et al.
Clinical and molecular
genetic features of
pulmonary hypertension in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. N Engl J Med 2001;345:325-34.
47. Leuchte HH, et al.
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic
peptide and renal insu. ciency as predictors of mortality in
pulmonary hypertension. Chest
2007;131:402-9.
48.
49. Souza R, et al NT-proBNP as a tool to
stratify disease severity in pulmonary
arterial hypertension. Respir Med 2007;101:69-75.
50. Leuchte HH, et al.
Brain natriuretic peptide
is a prognostic
parameter in chronic lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:744-50.
51. Alkowska A, et al. Serum N-terminal brain
natriuretic peptide as a prognostic
parameter in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Chest 2006;129:1313-21.
52. Leuchte HH,et al. Characterization of brain
natriuretic peptide in long- term
follow-up of pulmonary
arterial hypertension. Chest
2005;128:2368-74.
53. Souza
R, et al.
N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide
as a haemodynamic
marker in idiopathic
pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2005;25:509-13.
54. Leuchte HH, et al. Clinical
signiÞ cance of brain
natriuretic peptide in primary
pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol
2004;43:764-70.
55. Leuchte HH, et al. Brain natriuretic peptide
and exercise capacity in lung Þ brosis
and pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;170:360-5.
56. Nagaya N, , et al. Plasma brain natriuretic
peptide as a prognostic indicator
in patients with
primary pulmonary hypertension.
Circulation 2000;102:865-70.
57. Nagaya N, et al. Plasma brain natriuretic
peptide levels increase in proportion
to the extent
of right ventricular
dysfunction in pulmonary
hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:202-8.
58. Sudoh T, et al A new natriuretic peptide in porcine brain. Nature
1988;33215:78-81.
59. Mukoyama M, et al. Brain natriuretic peptide as a novel cardiac
hormone in humans: Evidence for an
exquisite dual natriuretic peptide system, atrial natriuretic
peptide and brain
natriuretic peptide. J
Clin Invest 1991;87:1402-12.
60.
61. Holmes
SJ, et al Renal, endocrine, and
hemodynamic e. ects of human brain
natriuretic peptide in
normal man. J
Clin Endocrinol Metab
1993;76:91-6.
62. Hall C. Essential biochemistry and
physiology of (NT-pro) BNP. Eur J Heart
Fail 2004;6:257-60.
63. Torbicki A, et al. Detectable serum cardiac
troponin T as a marker of poor prognosis
among patients with chronic precapillary pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 2003;108:844-8.
64. Nagaya N, et al. Serum uric acid levels
correlate with the severity and the
mortality of primary pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:487-92.
65. Nickel N, et al. Growth di. erentiation
factor-15 in idiopathic pulmonary arteria hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care
Med 2008;178:534-41.
66. Shah
SJ,et al Gomberg- Maitland M. Association of serum
creatinine with abnormal
hemodynamics and mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation 2008;117:2475-83.
67. Gharib H, Goellner JR: Fine-needle
aspiration biopsy of the thyroid: An appraisal. Ann Intern Med 118:282-289,
1993.
68. Greenlee RT,
69. Goellner JR, Gharib H, Grant CS, et al: Fine
needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid, 1980 to 1986. Acta Cytol 31:587-590,
1987.
70. Caraway NP, Sneige N, Samaan NA: Diagnostic
pitfalls in thyroid fine-needle aspiration: A review of 394 cases. Diagn
Cytopathol 9:345-350, 1993.
71. Ravetto C, Colombo L, Dottorini ME:
Usefulness of fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma: A
retrospective study in 37,895 patients. Cancer 90:357-363, 2000.
72. Wiseman SM, Baliski C, Irvine R, et al:
Hemithyroidectomy: The optimal initial surgical approach for individuals
undergoing surgery for a cytological diagnosis of follicular neoplasm. Ann Surg
Oncol 13:425-432, 2006
73. Griffith OL, et al: Assessment and
integration of publicly available SAGE, cDNA microarray, and oligonucleotide
microarray expression data for global coexpression analyses. Genomics
86:476-488, 2005.
74. Braunwald E, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline
update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment
elevation myocardial infarction.
75. Bertrand ME, et al. Management of acute
coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment
elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes of the
European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1809-1840.
76. Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the
management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
77. Van de Werf F, et al. Management of acute
myocardial infarction inpatients presenting with ST-segment elevation The Task
Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society
of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2003;24:28-66.
78. Holvoet P. Oxidative modification of
low-density lipoproteins in atherothrombosis. Acta Cardiol 1998;53:253-260.
79. Association between myeloperoxidase levels
and risk of coronary artery disease. JAMA 2001;286:2136-2142.
80. Wu AHB, , et al. Ischemia modified albumin,
free fatty acids, whole blood choline, B-type natriuretic peptide, glycogen
phosphorylase BB, and cardiac troponin. Wu AHB eds. Cardiac markers
2003:259-278 Humana Press Totowa, NJ.
81. Visse R, Nagase H. Matrix metalloproteinases
and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases; structure, function and
biochemistry. Circ Res 2003;92:827-839.
82. Wald NJ et al Serum screening for Down’s
syndrome between 8 and 14 weeks of pregnancy for the International Prenatal
Screening Research Group. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:407-412.
83.
84. Beaudeux JL, et al. Serum plasma
pregnancy-associated protein A. A potential marker of echogenic carotid
atherosclerotic plaques in asymptomatic hyperlipidemic subjects at high
cardiovascular risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003;23:e7-e10.
85. Stulc T,et al . Increased levels of
pregnancy associated plasma protein-A in patients with hypercholesterolemia:
the effect of atorvastatin treatment. Am Heart J 2003;146:e21.
86. Bayes-Genis A,et al . Insulin-like growth
factor binding protein-4 protease produced by smooth muscle cells increases in
the coronary artery after angioplasty. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001;21:335-341.
87. Baylin, S.B. (2005) DNA methylation and gene
silencing in cancer. Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol. 2 Suppl 1, S4-11. 20.
88. Belinsky,
89. Ludwig, J.A. and Weinstein, J.N. (2005)
Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection. Nat. Rev.
Cancer 5, 845-856.
90. Wistuba, II, Lam, Set al . (1997) Molecular
damage in the bronchial epithelium of current and former smokers. J. Natl.
Cancer Inst. 89, 1366-1373.
91. Senchenko, V.N. et al Discovery of frequent
homozygous deletions in chromosome 3p21.3 LUCA and AP20 regions in renal, lung
and breast carcinomas. Oncogene 23, 5719-5728.
92. Wiest, J.S.,et al .(1997) Genetic markers
for early detection of lung cancer and outcome measures for response to
chemoprevention. J. Cell Biochem. Suppl. 28-29, 64-73.
93. Zabarovsky, E. et al (2002) Tumor suppressor
genes on chromosome 3p involved in the pathogenesis of lung and other cancers.
Oncogene 21, 6915-6935.
94. Xue, X., Zhu, Y.M. and Woll, P.J. (2006)
Circulating DNA and lung cancer.
95. Mao, L., et al (1997) Clonal genetic
alterations in the lungs of current and former smokers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
89, 857-862.
96. Wistuba, II, Behrens, et al (1999)
Sequential molecular abnormalities are involved in the multistage development
of squamous cell lung carcinoma. Oncogene 18, 643-650.
97. Chung, G.T.et al (1995) Sequential molecular genetic changes
in lung cancer development. Oncogene 11, 2591-2598.
98.
99. Chaussade, L.,et al . (2001) Expression of
p15 and p15.5 products in neuroendocrine lung tumours: relationship with
p15(INK4b) methylation status. Oncogene 20, 6587-6596.
100. Esteller, M.,et al . (1999) Detection of
aberrant promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes in serum DNA from
non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Res. 59, 67-70.
101. Kurakawa, E.,et al . (2001) Hypermethylation
of p16 (INK4a) and p15(INK4b) genes in non-small cell lung cancer. Int. J.
Oncol. 19, 277-281.
102. Palmisano, W.A.et al . (2000) Predicting
lung cancer by detecting aberrant promoter methylation in sputum. Cancer Res.
60, 5954-5958.
103. Virmani, A.K., et al (2000) Promoter
methylation and silencing of the retinoic acid receptor- beta gene in lung
carcinomas. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92, 1303-1307.
104. Zochbauer-Muller,et al . (2001) Aberrant
promoter methylation of multiple genes in non-small cell lung cancers. Cancer
Res. 61, 249-255. D.H. (2006) Cohypermethylation of p16, and FHIT promoters as
a prognostic factor of recurrence in surgically resected stage I non-small cell
lung cancer. Cancer Res. 66, 4049-4054.
Received on 23.11.2009
Accepted on 30.12.2009
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research J. Pharmacology and
Pharmacodynamics 2(1): Jan. –Feb. 2010: 5-11